Pants on fire..

Usually when everyone around you says you did it; and you’re the only one who says you didn’t. It’s a pretty safe call to say that you did it. Roger Clemens was one of my heroes as a kid. He was the “Rocket”. One of the best of all time. Too bad he’s a cheater.

Andy Pettitte said today that Roger told him that he used HGH 10 years ago. Now this guy is supposed to be Roger’s best friend. Well, probably not anymore. I’m guessing if you call Roger Clemens a BIG CHEATER he’s not going to be your friend anymore.

Performance enhancing drugs are killing baseball for me. But at least for now we’re only talking about former Red Sox.. and not current ones.

GO SOX!

clemenshulk.jpg

6 Responses to “Pants on fire..”

  1. Innocent until proven guilty. Guess that only applies to some people right?
    Nice to see you failed to talk about Henry Waxman getting on his knees and blowing Mcnamee. Oh yes that did happen.

  2. Son of Bill Brasky Says:

    No it only applies to people on trial. he’s not. plus what proof has he shown that he hasn’t cheated? none.. it’s only his word. He’s going the Barry Bonds route. Everything points to yes..but he still says no.

    If you believe Roger than you have to believe Andy Pettite is a liar.

  3. Never trust a person named “Waxman”.

    Who needs proof when the idiot practically indicts himself.

    “I uhh, m-m-m-m-misremembered… m-m-m-misspoke… m-m-miss my mommy!!!”

    Texans. Whattyagonnado.

  4. So Pettite could not have misheard or misunderstood what Roger was saying? That is not possible right? You give people the benefit of doubt until it can be proven. I believe Pettite 100% that he believes what he said to be true, but there is a chance he is wrong, it doesn’t make him a liar.

    I am not saying I believe Roger, I am also not saying I disbelieve him, but I keep my mind open to possibilities until proof is presented. Roger doesn’t have to show anything that he hasn’t used HGH, that is not his responsibility. You have to show proof that he used it.

    Manny does acid. So that means Manny has to show proof that he doesn’t do acid?

    Did Bonds use HGH-probably but is there proof, nope. So unless you can proved he did something that was illegal you have to give him a pass.

    Also HGH was not a banned substance, so this who word cheating does not apply. Players play by the rules given to them, some break them, some bend them, but if the spit ball was not illegal to be thrown and someone threw it but a couple of years later they ban the spit ball, is that pitcher who used to throw it a cheater?

  5. Son of Bill Brasky Says:

    If Manny was out there trying to climb the Green Monster while trying to peel his face off that would be proof enough..

    Just like Barry Bonds head growing two full hat sizes in his 40s. Or Clemens pitching at his best in his 40s.. these things go against laws of physics.

    McNamee named 3 people. 2 admitted to it. Roger hasn’t. McNamee has no reason to lie about it. Roger does.

    I’m not a judge or a lawyer. I’m an Executioner.

Leave a Reply